SWI-Prolog 7.7.1 Reference Manual: Section 5.1

## 5.1 Lists are special

As of version 7, SWI-Prolog lists can be distinguished unambiguously at runtime from ``.`/2` terms and the atom `'[]'`. The constant `[]` is special constant that is not an atom. It has the following properties:

    ?- atom([]).
    false.
    ?- atomic([]).
    true.
    ?- [] == '[]'.
    false.
    ?- [] == [].
    true.

The `cons' operator for creating list cells has changed from the pretty atom `'.'` to the ugly atom `'[|]'`, so we can use the `'.'` for other purposes. See section 5.4.1.

This modification has minimal impact on typical Prolog code. It does affect foreign code (see section 11) that uses the normal atom and compound term interface for manipulation lists. In most cases this can be avoided by using the dedicated list functions. For convenience, the macros `ATOM_nil` and `ATOM_dot` are provided by `SWI-Prolog.h`.

Another place that is affected is write_canonical/1. Impact is minimized by using the list syntax for lists. The predicates read_term/2 and write_term/2 support the option `dotlists(true)`, which causes read_term/2 to read `.(a,[])` as `[a]` and write_term/2 to write `[a]` as `.(a,[])`.

### 5.1.1 Motivating '`[|]`' and `[]` for lists

Representing lists the conventional way using ``.`/2` as cons-cell and '[]' as list terminator both (independently) poses conflicts, while these conflicts are easily avoided.

- Using ``.`/2` prevents using this commonly used symbol as an operator because `a.B` cannot be distinguished from `[a|B]`. Freeing ``.`/2` provides us with a unique term that we can use for functional notation on dicts as described in section 5.4.1.

- Using `'[]'` as list terminator prevents dynamic distinction between atoms and lists. As a result, we cannot use type polymorphism that involve both atoms and lists. For example, we cannot use multi lists (arbitrary deeply nested lists) of atoms. Multi lists of atoms are in some situations a good representation of a flat list that is assembled from sub sequences. The alternative, using difference lists or DCGs is often less natural and sometimes demands for `opening' proper lists (i.e., copying the list while replacing the terminating empty list with a variable) that have to be added to the sequence. The ambiguity of atom and list is particularly painful when mapping external data representations that do not suffer from this ambiguity.

  At the same time, avoiding `'[]'` as a list terminator makes the various text representations unambiguous, which allows us to write predicates that require a textual argument to accept both atoms, strings, and lists of character codes or one-character atoms. Traditionally, the empty list can be interpreted both as the string "[]" and "".